TalkSoccer - Soccer / Football Forum - View Single Post

**azzurri** · 19-03-2008, 10:24 PM

channel4.com - Football Italia

Moggi's appeal was rejected and his ban upheld.

What that article fails to mention is his ban was upheld despite no new information being presented (since the old info proves there was no Moggi system), and despite this exact same court stating there were no fixed matches and the referee selections were fine.

In true calciogate fashion, the reasoning they gave was fucking bullshit and makes no sense. According to the TAR regional court, Moggi psychologically conditioned ref's to favour Juventus, despite this same court clearing the names of the ref's involved, saying no matches were fixed, and stats which show Juve were not favoured. I have no idea how they could prove refs were "psychologically conditioned".

Why have all the above inconsistencies happened? Take a look at this:

Specchio Economico
:::::::::::::::FEDERAZIONE::ITALIANA::GIUOCO::CALC IO::::::::::::::::::

Pasqual de Lise is the president of the TAR Regional Court and also the President of the FIGC's Commission of Sports Justice. Moggi was appealing the injustices of the FIGC to the same fucking person! A major conflict of interest that any half decent court in the world would never accept.

19-03-2008, 10:24 PM	#52 (permalink)
azzurri GLMDJ Favourite Team: Italy, Juventus azzurri is Offline Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 10,064 vCash: 369 Rep: Rep Points: 4432 Country:	channel4.com - Football Italia Moggi's appeal was rejected and his ban upheld. What that article fails to mention is his ban was upheld despite no new information being presented (since the old info proves there was no Moggi system), and despite this exact same court stating there were no fixed matches and the referee selections were fine. In true calciogate fashion, the reasoning they gave was fucking bullshit and makes no sense. According to the TAR regional court, Moggi psychologically conditioned ref's to favour Juventus, despite this same court clearing the names of the ref's involved, saying no matches were fixed, and stats which show Juve were not favoured. I have no idea how they could prove refs were "psychologically conditioned". Why have all the above inconsistencies happened? Take a look at this: Specchio Economico :::::::::::::::FEDERAZIONE::ITALIANA::GIUOCO::CALC IO:::::::::::::::::: Pasqual de Lise is the president of the TAR Regional Court and also the President of the FIGC's Commission of Sports Justice. Moggi was appealing the injustices of the FIGC to the same fucking person! A major conflict of interest that any half decent court in the world would never accept. __________________ Last edited by azzurri : 19-03-2008 at 11:44 PM.