View Single Post

Old 17-11-2007, 08:31 PM   #60 (permalink)
azzurri
GLMDJ
 
azzurri's Avatar

Favourite Team:
Italy, Juventus
 
azzurri is Offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,999
vCash: 369
Rep: azzurri is a Talk Soccer Masterazzurri is a Talk Soccer Masterazzurri is a Talk Soccer Masterazzurri is a Talk Soccer Masterazzurri is a Talk Soccer Masterazzurri is a Talk Soccer Masterazzurri is a Talk Soccer Masterazzurri is a Talk Soccer Masterazzurri is a Talk Soccer Masterazzurri is a Talk Soccer Masterazzurri is a Talk Soccer Master
Rep Points: 4432
Country:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAF
lol be blind to it then it's your call.

We had three very good chances that we couldn't finish (Pirlo off the line, Hutton over the bar and McFadden missing a sitter).

End of the day the ref won you the game with that bullshit call (if the shoe was on the other foot mate you would be calling for his head).
How can u possibly say that?

Di Natale's goal to make it 2-0. It was clearly onside, yet the linesmen ruled otherwise.

Ferguson goal to tie. It was clearly offside, yet the linesmen keeps his flag down.

The game would have been out of reach for Scotland if it werent for the ref! Forget about 1-1 in the 90th minute, it should have been 2-0.

We were robbed of a goal, and coceded an illegal 1. Do the match, Italy win, and Scotland bennefitted more from ref mistakes.

Its a simple logical progression of events. All I see is you highlighting 1 pt and ignoring others which happened b4 it, which are extremely relevant to the pt your trying to make.

There is nothing blind about my argument. U are using ref mistakes as an excuse for your loss, when u would have lost anyway without the Chiellini foul.
__________________

Last edited by azzurri : 17-11-2007 at 10:58 PM.
  Reply With Quote

register at bookmarks.com

Loan Consolidation | German sausage travel | Xecuter 3 Mod Chip | Buy PSP | News